Harriet Lee-Merrion
It was a lonely and cold life. In the chilly wastes of northern Europe during the last glacial period, when the ice sheets had spread from the poles and the forests had been driven far south, a small group of humans clung to existence.
They roamed widely, between the British Isles in the west and what is now Poland in the east, yet there were only a few hundred of them. They hunted reindeer and woolly rhinoceros, and made distinctive leaf-shaped stone tools.
And then they disappeared. No living person carries DNA from this little population, so the leaf-shaped stones and a few bones are just about all that is left of them. We don鈥檛 know what they called themselves or what happened to them. All we know is that they didn鈥檛 make it.
We are now realising that stories like this are surprisingly common in prehistory. While it can be tempting to think of human evolution as a tale of progress and success, ultimately leading to a global population, the reality is that many lineages of our species died out and left no descendants.
Now, thanks to insights from ancient DNA, we are finally able to tell some of their stories. These lost peoples are also shining a light on why our once-insignificant branch of the wider human family tree survived and thrived.
Human evolution and exodus
The oldest known Homo sapiens 鈥 or what we call modern humans 鈥 lived in Africa, perhaps 350,000 years ago. Our understanding of the earliest members of our species is fragmentary, because we have hardly any fossils. But we know from genetics that all non-African people alive today seem to be descended from a , who came out of Africa . After entering western Asia, some went east towards what are now India, China and Russia, while others headed north and west, to Europe.
All these lands were already inhabited by other species of human. The Neanderthals had been living in Europe and western Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. To the east were the mysterious Denisovans, and in the islands of South-East Asia there lived the diminutive Homo luzonensis and the 鈥渉obbits鈥, or Homo floresiensis. These would all soon disappear. The Neanderthals may have been the last survivors, clinging on in southern Spain until around 40,000 years ago.
We can see traces of the expansion of modern humans in the archaeological record. On the banks of the Don river in south-west Russia, archaeologists uncovered the remains of a man dubbed Kostenki-14, who lived 37,000 years ago. In 2014, DNA analysis revealed that he was closely related to today’s Europeans, and to some of the earliest modern humans in Europe. Further to the east, DNA from the showed that he belonged to a population that contributed to modern Asian peoples.
It is easy to interpret this as a story of modern humans triumphing. Thanks to our unique advantages 鈥 whether that is language, better tools, a more cooperative nature or something else 鈥 we outcompeted the Neanderthals and others, and today we reign supreme. We are the only remaining species of human, and there are over 8 billion of us.
Interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans
Of course, it isn鈥檛 quite as simple as that. For one thing, modern humans interbred with the Neanderthals and Denisovans and many people today carry their DNA, so, in some sense, these extinct hominins are still with us.
And more to the point, modern humans didn鈥檛 have it all their own way. The first groups to enter Europe don鈥檛 seem to have endured there. At Bacho Kiro cave in Bulgaria, for instance, there are H. sapiens bones from 46,000 to 42,000 years ago. A 2021 genomic analysis found that they are related to present-day East Asian people, but there is . They may have lived in Europe, but they didn鈥檛 survive there in the long term.聽The same seems to be true of modern humans who lived around 40,000 years ago in a cave in Romania.
鈥淭here is strong evidence that some early Homo sapiens groups that initially entered Europe did not contribute genetically to later populations,鈥 says at the University of California, Berkeley. 鈥淥nly molecular data revealed the absence of genetic continuity.鈥
One such lost group made those leaf-shaped artefacts. The distinctive tools were first discovered in the 1800s 鈥 at distant locations. British examples were called 鈥淟incombian鈥, after Lincombe Hill in Torquay: set into this hill is , where the artefacts were found. In Germany, the tools were discovered in 滨濒蝉别苍丑枚丑濒别 cave near the town of Ranis, so they were called 鈥淩anisian鈥. In Poland, similar artefacts were found in a , so they were dubbed 鈥淛erzmanowician鈥.
Leaf-shaped stone artefacts made by some of the earliest modern humans to reach Europe, found in 滨濒蝉别苍丑枚丑濒别 cave in Germany Josephine Schubert, Museum Burg Ranis
By the 1980s, archaeologists realised that these seemingly disparate objects were essentially identical, so they renamed them .
For a long time, we couldn鈥檛 be sure who made these tools, because they weren鈥檛 unambiguously associated with human remains. The mystery was finally solved in 2024, when a team led by at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, and recovered fragments of bone. The mitochondrial DNA within these revealed them to be from modern humans, who lived there around 45,000 years ago.
Archaeological evidence of lost lineages
The LRJ tools, it seems, were made by modern humans. Suggestive evidence from elsewhere now made sense: for instance, a 43,000-year-old jawbone from Kents Cavern had been .
Later in 2024, researchers led by , also at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, managed to obtain six nuclear genomes 鈥 the DNA from the heart of cells, as opposed to the more limited genetic material from mitochondria 鈥 from the 滨濒蝉别苍丑枚丑濒别 remains. , and a third female was more distantly related to them. There were also three males who weren鈥檛 close relatives of the three females, but did belong to the same lineage.
There was a surprise, however. The team also sequenced a genome from a second site: Zlat媒 k暖艌 in the Czech Republic, over 200 kilometres to the south-east. This individual proved to be a relative of two of the people from Ranis, despite living so far away. In other words, the people of Ranis and Zlat媒 k暖艌 all belonged to the same extended family.
Furthermore, the team was able to estimate the size of the group by examining how similar the genomes were. They estimated that there were around 200 breeding adults in the Ranis/Zlat媒 k暖艌 clan, and this had been steady for 15 generations. This figure was 鈥渆xtremely low given the large range from UK to Poland at the time鈥, study co-author , also at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, said in a press conference.
The implication is both eerie and incredible: that a population that barely numbered in the hundreds was scattered over a distance of over 1500 km.
Who were these people? Their DNA points to them having dark skin, eyes and hair 鈥 exactly what we would expect for people whose recent ancestors lived in Africa. Based on animal bones found in 滨濒蝉别苍丑枚丑濒别, the cave was mostly used by hibernating cave bears and denning hyenas, which indicates that the people only stayed there intermittently. Bones with cut marks, suggestive of butchery, point to the LRJ people (which still lived in Europe at the time).
Wolf and deer bones from 滨濒蝉别苍丑枚丑濒别 cave in Germany show that early Homo sapiens in Europe butchered these animals Geoff M. Smith
What happened to them? We don鈥檛 know for sure, but can hazard some guesses.
The LRJ people were far from humanity鈥檚 ancestral home in Africa, in ecosystems that were relatively new to them. The planet was in a glacial period, and while the Mediterranean and Africa were sheltered from the worst of it, northern Europe was feeling the chill. 鈥淭hese groups were living really at the extremes, and were also vulnerable to climate change,鈥 says at the University of T眉bingen in Germany.
Then there is their tiny population. 鈥淲hen you have a small group, if you lose an individual that hunts very well or who socially keeps the group together, everything can easily fall apart,鈥 says S眉mer. 鈥淚f there are only a few hundred of you, a few strokes of bad luck can spell doom 鈥 and if you don鈥檛 have any friendly neighbours, no one will come to your aid.”
In other words, the odds were stacked against the LRJ people and the other small bands of modern humans who were among the earliest waves to reach Europe. 鈥淔or a very long time, we thought that [Homo] sapiens arrived in Europe by 42,000 years ago,鈥 says at the University of Toulouse in France. But it is clear that some modern humans got there earlier. 鈥淭his colonisation is very likely to work as waves of populations coming to the west.鈥
In 2023, Slimak argued that there were . The third was the one that established our species throughout Europe. Its members made distinctive 鈥淧roto-Aurignacian鈥 artefacts. 鈥淲e find it everywhere, in all Europe,鈥 he says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a very large wave.鈥
Over and over, groups that get cut off from the network of the societies around them find themselves in trouble
The first two waves, in contrast, were smaller and less successful. 鈥淭hey go for some generations, some centuries, some millennia, in a part of Europe and then we lose their traces, and the genetics says we have no descendants of this population,鈥 says Slimak. He says the LRJ people look to have been from the second wave.
The three waves all came from the eastern Mediterranean, argues Slimak. After migrating from Africa, modern humans lived continuously in that area, and from time to time some of them wandered further afield. This can be seen at Ksar Akil, a rock shelter near the coast of Lebanon. It contains 22.6 metres of sediments, divided into 36 layers, giving an unprecedented record of changing stone tool technology between about 50,000 and 30,000 years ago. The most recent layers contain Proto-Aurignacian tools; older layers harbour tools resembling the LRJ.
Evidence from a French cave
One such early migration has been documented at Grotte Mandrin, a cave overlooking the Rh么ne valley in southern France. Neanderthals lived there from before 80,000 years ago until 54,000 years ago. But then modern humans pop up in the archaeological record of the cave, in the form of one baby tooth from about 54,000 years ago. There are also distinctive stone points, which may have been arrowheads. Traces of soot from fires suggest that 鈥 after which they either died or left, and the Neanderthals returned. Only around 44,100 years ago 鈥 during Slimak鈥檚 third wave 鈥 did modern humans return to this area in numbers and permanently.
Larger and more connected populations may also help explain why the third wave succeeded in Europe. “This one is certainly a very large wave of population,” says Slimak. The archaeological record suggests , perhaps partly because of . “They have a real success in terms of reproduction,” says Slimak. As populations became more dense, some people would have felt pressure to move, rapidly expanding their presence in the region. “You have a generation of people that have to move somewhere else where there are more proteins and less people.”
The larger populations may have also enabled Aurignacian people to maintain their cultural practices even as they moved long distances, which Slimak says is reflected in the uniformity of Aurignacian tools from different regions.
What about modern human groups elsewhere in the world? Did some of them also die out? There is tentative evidence from the Americas (see “Extinction in the Americas鈥), but for the most part we are stymied by bias in the archaeological record due to the fact that DNA doesn’t preserve well in hot and humid environments. 鈥淲e have really good preservation of DNA in colder climates,鈥 says Harvati, hence the many examples of local extinctions in Eurasia. 鈥淲e don鈥檛 know what鈥檚 going on elsewhere.鈥
In particular, we have very little ancient DNA from Africa, the modern human heartland. 鈥淚f you鈥檙e in one of the core areas, there鈥檚 always going to be other people around,鈥 says Harvati. This may mean that African populations were safer, because they were always part of a network and could get help if they ran into trouble. But without DNA we can鈥檛 be sure.
Nevertheless, one lesson is clear: isolation is deadly. Over and over, groups that get 鈥渃ut off from the bigger network of the societies around them鈥 find themselves in trouble, says Harvati. And once the group size starts shrinking, their culture may die even if some of the people survive. 鈥淚f you have a certain level of population collapse, then you also have loss of cultural knowledge as well,鈥 she says. 鈥淚f only a handful of individuals survive, then a lot of the traditions and the cultural knowledge of that group don鈥檛 necessarily make it, even if those people get absorbed in another group.鈥
People, it turns out, need people. And for our lineage 鈥 just one branch on a once-diverse family tree 鈥 this seems to have been the key to our survival and global ascendency.
Extinction in the Americas
North and South America were the last continents reached by our species, apart from Antarctica. People first entered the north-western part of North America in what is now Alaska, which is only a few tens of kilometres from the north-eastern corner of Eurasia.
However, there is a lot of disagreement and uncertainty about when and how people got there. In a 2022 review, at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and his colleagues argued that the evidence to date suggests that and spread rapidly across both continents.
Other researchers have claimed that modern humans were there earlier. At Chiquihuite cave in Mexico, sediments laid down 33,000 years ago contained what appear to be stone tools. Meanwhile, footprints from White Sands National Park in New Mexico seem to be 21,000 to 23,000 years old 鈥 and earlier this year, the same site yielded marks that may have been left by crude wooden vehicles.
One interpretation is that there were early migrations into the Americas and those groups died out, just like the first modern humans in Europe. However, Potter is sceptical, arguing for instance that the Chiquihuite tools are so crude, they may be the result of natural processes such as rockfall, rather than human activity.
Fossilised footprints at the White Sands National Park in New Mexico from around 23,000 years ago Associated Press/Alamy
Nevertheless, evidence is emerging of lost lineages in the Americas. A study published in May looked at DNA from 21 people who lived in Colombia between 6000 and 500 years ago. This revealed a , closely related to the first people to enter South America. They appear not to have contributed to any modern populations, and were ultimately replaced by groups that came from Central America.
Embark on a captivating journey through time as you explore key Neanderthal and Upper Palaeolithic sites of southern France, from Bordeaux to Montpellier, with 最新麻豆视频鈥檚 Kate Douglas.
Neanderthals, ancient humans and cave art: France
Topics: