Global warming is causing forest die-offs today, just as it did during the Permian-Triassic extinction event INA FASSBENDER/AFP via Getty Images
After a sharp rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels 252 million years ago, the death of forests led to a long-term shift in Earth鈥檚 climate, with greenhouse conditions persisting for millions of years.
Scientists working to understand this event, which caused the biggest mass extinction in Earth鈥檚 history, warn that a similar story may unfold if we continue emitting greenhouse gases.
Advertisement
The Permian-Triassic extinction event is thought to have been triggered by massive volcanic activity in the region that is now Siberia, which raised CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
The planet鈥檚 surface temperature increased by up to 10掳C and, in equatorial regions, the average surface temperature soared to 34掳C (93掳F) 鈥 8掳C higher than the average today.
These conditions persisted for around 5 million years, resulting in the extinction of , according to some estimates.
Free newsletter
Sign up to The Earth Edition
Unmissable news about our planet, delivered straight to your inbox each month.

While some researchers have recently argued that these mass extinction events actually had minimal effects on terrestrial ecosystems, at the University of Adelaide in Australia is convinced that, starting 252 million years ago, life was brought to its knees.
鈥淧ockets of life might survive through a mass extinction in little enclaves or oases here and there, but you can go to many of the Permian-Triassic sections of the fossil record and see that whole ecosystems died out,鈥 says Merdith.
He and his colleagues studied the fossil record to understand why the super greenhouse event driving the mass extinction lasted 5 million years instead of the 100,000 years that climate models predict it should have.
They found that, across huge swathes of Earth, forests with canopies that were up to 50 metres high were replaced by hardy ground cover plants just 5 centimetres to 2 metres in height. Peat bogs, another ecosystem that stores large amounts of carbon, were also wiped out in tropical regions.
Using a computer model of Earth鈥檚 climate and geochemistry, the researchers showed that the loss of these ecosystems meant that CO2 levels stayed high for millions of years. This is mainly because vegetation has a big impact on weathering, a process that draws carbon out of the atmosphere and stores it in rocks and soil over long timescales.
There are strong parallels with the present, says Merdith, as the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are increasing rapidly. If temperatures continue to rise, then tropical and subtropical forests may struggle to adapt, crossing a threshold where vegetation can no longer play its crucial role in balancing the climate.
Merdith says the new work shows you don’t get a 鈥減ing-pong effect鈥, where the atmosphere can quickly recover after equatorial forests are lost.
鈥淚t’s not like you’re in an icehouse, then you go to a greenhouse for a little bit, then drop straight back down into an icehouse,鈥 he says. 鈥淥nce you start the ball rolling, the Earth just finds its new equilibrium point, which is not necessarily what it was before.鈥
at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, who wasn’t involved in the study, says reconstructing these events is like 鈥減utting a puzzle together with many missing pieces鈥, but that the team鈥檚 argument is 鈥減lausible鈥.
However, there is still a lot of uncertainty over what was happening in the oceans at this time, she says. 鈥淭he oceans hold much more carbon than the land and atmosphere combined, and we really have no idea what happened to ocean biology, chemistry and physical circulation during that event,鈥 says Meissner.
Journal reference:
Nature Communications:
Topics: